Connect with us

Arsenal

Why Splashing £25m On This Ivorian Is A Bad Choice By Liverpool

Published

on

Liverpool is going to play Champions League finally after some painful seasons in the wilderness, trying to get their feet back together.

Now there have been strong rumours about Liverpool and Arsenal being interested in Swansea’s striker Wilfried Bony, who has scored an impressive tally of 26 goals in all competitions for the Welsh club. While Arsenal’s interest in the Swansea man is obvious as they want a striker to add depth, these rumours clearly give us an indication of where Liverpool are heading towards. Brendan Rodgers wants to keep the current set-up alive, with a diamond midfield and two strikers playing in front of an attacking midfielder. With Bony, they would get a good quality striker who can be more than a back-up for either Sturridge or Suarez.

The problem for both the clubs is the valuation of the Ivorian. Bony is a quality striker, yes. But is he worth the cost of £25 million pounds? Definitely, no. Bony can be a good addition if the price tag is around £15 million odd, but paying extra money for a substitute striker for rotation purposes than what they paid for one of their top performers Daniel Sturridge, doesn’t make sense. Yes, it is to price him away from Swansea but it still doesn’t add the sort of depth required to be a competent force in the Champions League. With the Ivorian set to play in the World cup next month, you can follow the football betting odds and see if chances are that his price might increase if he manages to have a decent campaign.

Playing a 4-1-2-1-2 diamond formation can hit Liverpool in the Champions League against teams with much better overall quality. Playing with a four man midfield, with the furthest midfielder being attack minded, can be a harmful tactic by Brendan Rodgers. Liverpool have had a leaky defence this season in the Premier League this past season and the Champions League will definitely have some good attacking teams than most of the teams in the Premier League. But here, even the defences of seasoned Champions League teams will be tough to break down.

Liverpool have had a roller coaster performances against Arsenal and Manchester City as well as registering a double loss against this season’s Champions League semi-finalists Chelsea. Liverpool need to strengthen their attacking midfield as they would need to field more midfielders in the Champions League as well as have more depth to be competent in both the CL and the EPL. Currently Liverpool have only two options in attacking midfield/wings in Philippe Coutinho and Raheem Sterling. With another attacking option, Liverpool would be able to rotate their squad perfectly by using the 4-2-3-1 in UCL and the diamond in the league. A good number of midfielders give more control as well as defensive stability against some of the top teams in Europe. The question here is again, to maintain the balance of the squad.

Bony can be a good addition for the strikers department, but his price tag is too much, especially since he’s a striker with limited technique. The need of the hour is getting an attacking midfielder who can play along with Coutinho, Sterling and form a 3 man attack option behind Suarez and Sturridge. Next step is to find a defensive midfielder to replace Lucas and Gerrard and a left-back to cover for Jon Flanagan.

 

 

 

Arsenal

Eni Aluko Responds to Laura Woods’ Damning Comments With Long Statement as Ian Wright Row Continues

Published

on

Eni Aluko addresses Laura Woods' critical remarks in a detailed statement, as the debate over women's football coverage with Ian Wright intensifies.

Eni Aluko has responded to a lengthy social media thread from Laura Woods amid the ongoing controversy surrounding her feud with Ian Wright. Aluko caused outrage in 2025 when she accused Wright of blocking opportunities for female pundits, and she has reaffirmed her stance this week.

https://twitter.com/TeleFootball/status/2020906826351489326

The former England international, who represented the Lionesses 105 times during her career, bemoaned the fact that two men, Wright and Nedum Onuoha, were on the punditry panel for the Women’s Euro 2025 final. This reignited a debate that many thought had been settled months ago.

Woods Pushes Back on Caps Argument

Woods took to social media on Monday morning to post a long thread explaining that caps don’t win automatic work. That comment came after Aluko pointed out she was sitting in the stands of last year’s final next to Fara Williams, who has 172 England caps.

The TNT Sports presenter added, “The women’s game should be by women for women is one of the most damaging phrases I’ve heard. It will not only drag women’s sport backwards, it will drag women’s punditry in all forms of the game backwards.” This is a fair point from Woods, who has built her career on merit rather than relying on playing credentials.

https://twitter.com/JakeTalksFutbol/status/2020210180101992805

Aluko Stands Firm on Position

Responding to Woods, with whom she has worked previously, the 38 year old stated, “I respect Laura’s opinion as I have always done. I believe that women’s football should prioritise women as the faces of the sport. I think women should be the dominant force in the women’s game in the same way that men are the dominant force in the men’s game.”

Aluko also slammed Wright for declining her attempted apology last year. “When I apologised to Ian Wright publicly and privately, he had an opportunity to show grace. Unfortunately my sincerity, my humility, was met with disrespect.” This ongoing feud shows no signs of ending anytime soon.

Also read: London City Lionesses vs. Everton Women: Predicted Lineups + Match Preview

Continue Reading

Arsenal

3 Things We Learned From Arsenal’s Nervy 2-1 Victory Over Brighton

Published

on

Three Things We Learned From Arsenal's Nervy 2 to 1 Victory Over Brighton

Arsenal‘s 2-1 win over Brighton on December 27 revealed three critical truths about their title challenge and season trajectory heading into the final stretch.

The Gunners showed resilience but exposed defensive vulnerabilities that could prove catastrophic against Manchester City. Martin Odegaard’s clinical finishing and Brighton’s own goal masked deeper problems within Arsenal’s structure. Mikel Arteta’s men survived because Brighton lacked quality, not because Arsenal dominated.

https://twitter.com/Arsenal/status/2004964996829020454

Arsenal’s Defensive Fragility Remains Their Achilles Heel

Myles Lewis-Skelly’s nervous display highlighted Arsenal’s defensive depth concerns. The young left-back was withdrawn after 67 minutes with Arteta forced to shift Piero Hincapie left and introduce Gabriel Magalhaes. Brighton created legitimate chances through Yasin Ayari and Yankuba Minteh, with the latter forcing a world-class David Raya save in the 89th minute.

https://twitter.com/Arsenal/status/2004961858051342764

Manchester City will punish these defensive lapses ruthlessly. William Saliba appeared uncomfortable throughout, and Lewis-Skelly’s inexperience showed repeatedly. Arsenal need Gabriel Magalhaes and Riccardo Calafiori back to full fitness immediately. Without consistent defensive solidity, no amount of Odegaard brilliance secures the title.

Fortuitous Circumstances Carried Arsenal Rather Than Merit

Georginio Rutter’s own goal proved the difference in reality. Arsenal should have been 2 to 0 up at half-time with multiple clear chances. Martin Zubimendi had a guilt-edge header saved by Bart Verbruggen. Leandro Trossard fired wide from close range.

https://twitter.com/Arsenal/status/2004959003743523077

The hosts never played at optimum level despite dominating possession. Brighton grew into the game after half-time and genuinely threatened. The narrative of Arsenal’s unstoppable form crumbles when examining performance metrics. They’re winning tightly contested matches through individual moments rather than systematic dominance.

Gyokeres Still Needs Time to Adjust

Viktor Gyokeres had a sloppy opening 45 minutes according to GOAL’s ratings. The Swedish summer signing is struggling to find rhythm in Arsenal’s system. His involvement in link up play remains pedestrian.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2SpFxuWvoA

Arsenal invested heavily in Gyokeres expecting elite performance immediately. Instead they’re watching a player adapting to new surroundings without consistent output. Against City’s defensive intensity, Gyokeres cannot afford settling in periods. Arsenal need him sharp now, not eventually.

Also read: Opta Supercomputer Predicts Arsenal’s Upcoming Fixture Against Brighton

Continue Reading

Arsenal

Arsenal Player Ratings vs. Brighton: Odegaard’s Clinical Finish and Rutter Own Goal Secure Gunners Top Spot

Published

on

Arsenal vs Brighton Men's Preview.

Arsenal secured a 2 to 1 win over Brighton on December 27 to maintain their Premier League summit position. Martin Odegaard’s clinical 15th-minute finish set the tone before Georginio Rutter’s own goal in the 53rd minute appeared to secure a comfortable victory.

Diego Gomez’s 64th-minute rebound sparked a nervy finish, but David Raya’s world-class save from Yankuba Minteh sealed crucial three points as Arsenal held their two-point cushion over Manchester City.

Goalkeepers and Defence

David Raya (8/10): Didn’t really have a great deal to do for the first 60 minutes. He could do little about Brighton’s goal but made a world-class stop to deny Minteh late on with fierce curling strike.

Declan Rice (7/10): Playing in an unfamiliar right-back role, the midfielder played his part in the buildup to Odegaard’s goal. His corner led to Arsenal’s second. Did a solid job once again for his team in an energetic display.

https://twitter.com/Arsenal/status/2005036216195166465

William Saliba (6/10): The Frenchman had no real howlers but didn’t excel in Arsenal’s backline either. Will be glad to have centre-back partner Gabriel Magalhaes back alongside him soon.

Piero Hincapie (7/10): The summer signing has been a solid addition for Arsenal and didn’t do much wrong, both at centre-back and left back against Brighton.

Myles Lewis-Skelly (5/10): On his first Premier League start of the season, partly due to Riccardo Calafiori’s withdrawal from the warm-up, he did not do a great deal. Arteta chose to take off the left-back, move Hincapie to that position, and bring on Gabriel instead.

https://twitter.com/Arsenal/status/2005021116373377187

Midfield and Attack

Martin Odegaard (7/10): Rifled in a terrific finish when given time and space to do so. Had a bit of swagger early on but that dimmed as Brighton turned on the pressure.

Martin Zubimendi (6/10): Was part of a midfield that looked in control and then that switched after the Brighton goal. May need to offer a bit more going forward.

https://twitter.com/Arsenal/status/2005013566550675485

Mikel Merino (6/10): The Spaniard has been excellent as a makeshift striker but wasn’t nearly as effective in his usual midfield role.

Bukayo Saka (7/10): Calmly assisted Odegaard for Arsenal’s opener and had the beating of left-back Maxim De Cuyper. Didn’t have many moments to shine but still can produce something from nothing.

Viktor Gyokeres (5/10): Had a sloppy and unconvincing start, both with and without the ball. Improved a bit but it’s just not clicking for the summer signing.

Leandro Trossard (6/10): The Belgian, who was getting a bit of stick from the travelling support, had a decent game against his former club but wasn’t as effective as the encounter wore on.

Also read: Arsenal vs. Brighton: Predicted Lineups + Match Preview

Continue Reading

Home » Teams » Arsenal » Why Splashing £25m On This Ivorian Is A Bad Choice By Liverpool

Trending